Bigoted skank gets the heave-ho A sixth newspaper - the Sanford Herald of central North Carolina - has now dropped syphilitic c*unt mAnn Coulter's column in the wake of her "faggot" comment.
Damn! Hate to lose an excellent Democratic recruiter like that! You have to figure for every one 'person' ('sick, demented entity' might better describe them) she attracts, 15 are revulsed toward the Dems. Same with a guy like Michael Savage. When the inattentive middle-roaders just happen to catch a few of their SERIOUS outrageous comments, it probably is (sad to say, in a way) worth more votes to the Dems than a cogent,factual article/book by any number of the excellent liberal/progressive authors out there.
Yeah, put me down for fuck censorship. I know, I know, this isn't technically censorship, but it never is, technically. I mean what, just because a law wasn't passed, that means speech isn't being surpressed?
And em's got the utilitarian argument covered. Seriously, why would anyone want to help the Repugs hide what they are, or at least what they tacitly support? It took six years of utter hell to turn just a few of these cats; our era's notable for the amount of defection from the right, but it's still not enough to make more than a dent. I'm not sure we can afford to shut people like Coulter up.
Damn! Hate to lose an excellent Democratic recruiter like that! You have to figure for every one 'person' ('sick, demented entity' might better describe them) she attracts, 15 are revulsed toward the Dems. Same with a guy like Michael Savage. When the inattentive middle-roaders just happen to catch a few of their SERIOUS outrageous comments, it probably is (sad to say, in a way) worth more votes to the Dems than a cogent,factual article/book by any number of the excellent liberal/progressive authors out there.
ReplyDeleteYeah, put me down for fuck censorship. I know, I know, this isn't technically censorship, but it never is, technically. I mean what, just because a law wasn't passed, that means speech isn't being surpressed?
ReplyDeleteAnd em's got the utilitarian argument covered. Seriously, why would anyone want to help the Repugs hide what they are, or at least what they tacitly support? It took six years of utter hell to turn just a few of these cats; our era's notable for the amount of defection from the right, but it's still not enough to make more than a dent. I'm not sure we can afford to shut people like Coulter up.