August 26, 2009

Free speech should not mean being free to lie out your ass

Glenn Beck calling Obama ‘racist’ is grounds for pulling ads, but Fux’s routine and demonstrable lying is not.
Why is anyone using “racist” or “nazi” subject to huge public backlash when FLAT OUT LYING about the things that most affect our daily lives has no penalty at all.

[W]hy is bold-faced lying, intentional misrepresentation of facts, and promoting mob behavior NOT grounds for boycotts? Why doesn’t the REAL harm Fox news does to our country not subject them to some kind of backlash?

5 comments:

  1. Wangmo8:21 PM

    They need to be next! Or we could just hang Murdock by the thumbs in the Town Square until he promises to KNOCK IT OFF!

    ReplyDelete
  2. barrelhse10:21 PM

    Somehow the inmates are calling the shots at the asylum. Those drooling, retarded pieces of fuck who believe in this horseshit are the scary part. The Idiot Right should be marginalized to a GOP "free-speech zone" where they can be ignored or set on fire. Why are a bunch inbred losers getting such a disproportionate amount of attention?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Beck's AA sponsor decided to leave him too...
    http://unreasonablysafe.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/becklosessponsor/
    You can now add Darenn Tipple’s name to the growing list of sponsors who have dropped the doltish FoxNews show host.  Tipple had been Beck’s AA (Alcoholics’ Anonymous) sponsor for the past two years; a feat many thought was impossible considering that...

    ReplyDelete