'As the media continue to focus on the missing weapons of mass destruction in coming weeks and months, the issue will further underscore the divisions in the party. It will be interesting to see how the issue plays out, given the unpredictable twists and turns of presidential politics.
'Just as no one would have guessed at this point in the first President Bush's career that he would end up losing his reelection bid, it's impossible to say what impact this issue will have on the 2004 race. While some Republicans are fretting privately about the failure to find weapons of mass destruction, others are predicting that the issue will have no political impact.
'"Whether or not they find weapons of mass destruction doesn't matter, because the rationale for the war changed," GOP pollster Frank Luntz told the AP. "Americans like a good picture. And one photograph of an Iraqi child kissing a U.S. soldier is more powerful than two months of debate on the floor of Congress."'That may be so. Certainly, Americans are willing to pay for their safety. But, once the euphoria of victory has begun to fade, if no trace of the weapons is ever found, and doubt is raised about Iraq's link to al Qaeda, some voters who supported the war might begin to weigh the value of its multibillion dollar price tag during a time of economic uncertainty and escalating federal deficits.' - More unbelievable assrimming here.
??? Earth to the presstitutes at the Washington comPost: your drooling deserter-in-chief LIED. He lied to Congress, he lied to the American public, he lied to the world, and he lied to the servicemen and -women he sent over there. He lied, and is responsible for the DEATHS of THOUSANDS.
You f*cking whores.
No comments:
Post a Comment