The war on terrorism's number-one distraction
"[T]he apprehension of Hussein does not justify the war. In a way, it is the least that Bush could have done, after invading under false pretenses. He told the American public that it was necessary to bomb, invade and occupy Iraq - rather than engage in more aggressive weapons inspections - to neutralize the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. He claimed that his administration possessed incontrovertible proof that Hussein had such awful weapons and maintained operational links with al Qaeda. Seven months after entering Iraq, the Bush administration has not been able to produce evidence to support its central case for war." - - David Corn.
'Why am I even running when
George is so manly and superior?'
December 15, 2003
Posted by maru at 12/15/2003 11:03:00 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment