July 2, 2005

Frog-marching Rove down Yellowcake Lane
Headline stolen from Eschaton!

From TalkLeft:

[T]he investigation has moved from one involving the identity of the White House official to one involving perjury - i.e., a cover-up. The source may have been questioned in front of the grand jury and lied.

Knowing the identity of the source is not enough for a perjury conviction. There must be two witnesses to the perjurious statement. Telephone records would not be enough, because they only provide the number dialed, not the identity of the person speaking. Matthew Cooper's and Judith Miller's e-mails and notes may provide that corroboration.

And from RimJob's Circlejerk Central:

  • FOX discussed this a couple days ago, every one, including Mara Liasson said no crime had been committed, not even by Novak.

  • Rove WASN't involved! even Novak said it wasn't anyone in the Bush Administration that leaked her name. O'Donnall is a lying sack of guano!

  • If Rove were guilty of a crime then a whole string of democrats will be facing similar charges

  • "O'Donnall is a lying sack of guano!" That's all we need to know. I don't have to read the article.


  • ***

    No comments: