July 4, 2006

Rule of law
At "American Thinker," some asshat isn't trying hard enough:

Why obey the Supreme Court?

My question is, quite bluntly, if the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to hear this case, then why should the President, the Congress, and the American people obey its ruling?

The Hamdan decision is part of a larger pattern whereby elite liberal institutions, e.g., the Supreme Court {????! - Ed.} and the New York Times, increasingly consider themselves to be the supreme arbiters of the national interest, and to be authorized to undermine the policies and decisions made by the elected branches of the federal government. At some point, the federal government and the American people have to stop “enabling” this harmful behavior. And that foot is me That point is now.
So the only 'arbiter of the national interest' should be the Dictator-tot and his rubber-stamp asslicking minions, is that what you're saying? What the fuck is wrong with you?

No comments: