November 15, 2007

David Broder: partisan suckhole of ballpudding, liar

Broder, on Friday:

Q: Will you and the media ever apply as much scrutiny to the Giuliani marriages as you have done to the single Clinton marriage?

The hypocritical rethuglican yankmonkey: I plan to leave both subjects alone.

Broder, in his column today:

No one who has read or studied the large literature of memoirs and biographies of the Clintons can doubt the intimacy and the mutual dependence of their political and personal partnership.

No one can reasonably expect that partnership to end should Hillary Clinton be elected president. But the country must decide whether it is comfortable with such a sharing of the power and authority of the highest office in the land.

It is a difficult question for any of the Democratic rivals to raise. But it lingers, even if unasked.

Ah, the neverending insanity of Clinton hatred.

Bonus: blogger Greg Sargent notes "voters have told pollsters again and again and again that they are comfortable with" the prospect of Bill Clinton being back in the White House, and see it "as either a non-issue or a positive."

(Via TPM)

1 comment:

ThePoliticalCat said...

Please don't make me think of his veined liver-spotted trembling old hands parting his flabby, sagging, wrinkled cheeks for an application of that assjuice. BLARGH.