November 16, 2007

Does marrying Bill Clinton qualify someone to be President?

Does being a repuke qualify someone to be a partisan douchebag? Does having a father for a president qualify someone to be president? More insane Hillary-hatred from the right:

If a CEO of a fortune 500 company were to retire, would anyone seriously consider his wife to be an adequate replacement simply because she was married to him when he ran the company? What about a Super Bowl winning football team? What do you think the reaction of their fans would be if their coach's wife was being seriously discussed as his replacement? It sounds ridiculous, doesn't it? Yet, Hillary Clinton has practically been anointed by the press and the punditocracy as our next President, despite the fact that her run at the presidency is almost entirely based on being Bill Clinton's wife...
What the f*ck?? Whose ass did this sap pull this crappola from, his own or Rush Limpbag?

He then goes on to list the reasons why she should not be considered as a candidate: "an off-putting sham marriage" -- as compared to multiple-marrieds Rudy and Fred? Mitt's Mormon marriage, complete with off-putting creepy undergarments? -- her "minimal charisma" -- as qualified by whom? some basement-dwelling mouthbreather with a bad hairpiece? -- her "polarizing figure" -- which is in part thanks to insane Clinton haters like yourself, moron -- her "reputation as a shameless liar" -- name one! and how many lies by the current president would you like me to name? how much time do you have? -- and get this: "she has been involved in more scandals than the whole rest of the Democratic and Republican fields combined..." -- again, lists, please? -- "... and so far, in her entire tenure in the Senate, she has never once accomplished anything of great significance or displayed notable leadership on any issue."

Yeah, tell that to her constituents in New York, bonehead. Christ.

No comments: