So if ACORN itself is "guilty" for something or other, based on what some of their employees did, what does that make rightwing faux "journalist" and Matt Drudge poodle Andrew Breitbart, who has now admitted that accused felon James O'Keefe worked for him?A hypocritical asshole? An odious, Drudge-humping cumbubble? A should-have-been-strangled-at-birth twathole? A fucking idiot? A lowlife gasbag? Much more at link above.
Even if we stipulate that Breitbart was not paying O'Keefe to break the law, its clear that ACORN was not paying its workers to break the law either --- at least no evidence exists to demonstrate otherwise. And yet, ACORN has long been charged by Breitbart, and Hewitt himself (a long-time leader in the GOP's phony "Democrats are committing massive voter fraud through ACORN!" movement), as being a "criminal organization" for having employed those workers who did break federal law by committing voter registration fraud in order to continue receiving their "fair salary."
So, again, if ACORN is "guilty" for all of that, what does that make Breitbart?
January 28, 2010
Posted by maru at 1/28/2010 01:01:00 PM