Prissy little slimeball wins major award
Obnoxious twit (dis)honored for being a misadministration whore.
For reporting that is an embarrassment to the profession of journalism, and for being beholden to corporate paymasters rather than the citizens of America, Tucker Carlson is the BuzzFlash Media Putz of the Week.Because there isn't an award yet for Shameless Bottom-dwelling Hosebag.
Speaking of insufferable, head-up-their-ass dipshits, is R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. what is called a total douchebag? And does he work at his computer wearing a snazzy, tight little bowtie that cuts off the circulation to his stupid massive head? Here he is the the American Expectorator:
The other night when I watched the Democratic presidential candidates participate in what they presumed to call a "debate," I wondered anew about the failure of one of my political coinages to catch on. The debate was sponsored by CNN and what is called YouTube, which is essentially an agglutination of home videos filmed for and by that preposterous mass of shut-ins who sit in their underwear day and night glued to the Internet. Over a dozen of these sad sacks filmed their mainly ignorant questions, and a CNN talking head then directed the inquiries to those Democrats who aspire to the responsibilities of a Roosevelt or a Kennedy. The questions bespoke the questioners' gloom or indignation or narcissism or infantile stupidity, and occasionally all of the above. Not one of the questioners struck me as a normal American....What... a... douche. A "universe of fears, angers, threats, and megalomaniacal fantasies"? Gee, he could be describing RimJob's Freetardia or Lucy the Bat's Cave for Mouthbreathing Troglodytes, Bill O'Reilly's webpage or any of the other rightwingnut dittohead blogs. And I can just imagine what their questions would be for the republicant candidates -- "Gee, Mr Thompson, you are so awesome! How did your role in 'Law and Order' prepare you for running for president?!"
With YouTube we have more than a universe of rumors. It is a universe of fears, angers, threats, and megalomaniacal fantasies -- and the tribe likes it that way. Or I should say the Democratic candidates like it that way. Not one objected to the indignity of the CNN-YouTube "debate." All hope to lead America in time of war.
"Mr Giuliani, you were so awesome during September 11th -- why do Democrats love terrorists?"
"When you are president, Senator McCain, how long will it take before you nuke Iran or North Korea?"
"Ummm, Mr Romney -- awesome hair, dude. Uhhhh, boxers, briefs, or those funky Mormon underpants?"
3 comments:
What are "funky Morman underpants"?
I had a pic of them posted not too long ago, I'll see if I can find it. They're grotesque, btw.
I actually thought the YouTube format left one important thing to be desired: the ability to ask follow up questions when the "candid"-ates worm out of answering the original ones. Better if you submit a question, YouTube-style or otherwise, and then if your question is selected you get to ask it in person or via a WebCam link, with follow up questions permitted...
Post a Comment