Really! So when are you going to start?? Digby, reflecting on the asshole media's response to the "Hillary dirt on Obama" nonstory, rightfully says this is "one of the most perfect examples of everything that's wrong with journalism today" --
What information did we learn?
First, we learned about the Bob Novak blind item that accuses Hillary Clinton of "slime" politics and Barack Obama of having some skeletons in his closet that nobody knows about. We then learned that even though his nickname has long been "No-facts" for his lack of attribution in his columns, Bob Novak must be telling the truth now because he proved that he had a real source in Richard Armitage when he outed a CIA agent. Therefore, we can fully trust that the Clinton campaign was behind the story. We also learned about some guy who supported Obama financially who turned out to be a crook and we learned that "it's out there" that Bill Clinton has been schtupping other women, perhaps in London, and that Obama's staff is pimping that around.
Is any of that considered professional journalism? Is any of it remotely necessary for voters to know? Because it reminds me of a boozy lunch with a bunch of bored rich divorcees only less interesting and far more consequential.
Chris Matthews is an imbecile and a scumbag with an obscure personal agenda. Everything he says in that exchange should disqualify him from having a news show.
First, we learned about the Bob Novak blind item that accuses Hillary Clinton of "slime" politics and Barack Obama of having some skeletons in his closet that nobody knows about. We then learned that even though his nickname has long been "No-facts" for his lack of attribution in his columns, Bob Novak must be telling the truth now because he proved that he had a real source in Richard Armitage when he outed a CIA agent. Therefore, we can fully trust that the Clinton campaign was behind the story. We also learned about some guy who supported Obama financially who turned out to be a crook and we learned that "it's out there" that Bill Clinton has been schtupping other women, perhaps in London, and that Obama's staff is pimping that around.
Is any of that considered professional journalism? Is any of it remotely necessary for voters to know? Because it reminds me of a boozy lunch with a bunch of bored rich divorcees only less interesting and far more consequential.
Chris Matthews is an imbecile and a scumbag with an obscure personal agenda. Everything he says in that exchange should disqualify him from having a news show.
Exactly. It is shit like Tweety's that drove me away from the TV and the computer for a few days last week. And it never ends. Here are just a few examples of the "liberal media"'s journamalistic integrity over the past few days:
Talk about failure.
1 comment:
yeah, and don't ya know they WANT to drive us ALL away.
Thank God you came back Maru, and when we need to get away, we need to get away BUT
WE ALL NEED to always come back, hopefully rejeuvenated and re ready to do battle against these ignorant, back water, barefooted, inbred, bakkychewin, no edjacashuned, opinion out the backside, mouthbreathin, familyfuckin', freedom hatin ASSHOLES FROM HELL!!!!
lest we loose our home here!
ya know?
siri@legitgov.org
www.legitgov.org
Post a Comment