Choosing Sarah Failin raises serious questions about John McCain’s qualifications, says some anti-war-hero fascist who hates America. Since the piece is from the savagely-biased NY Times, we can just discount it as the savage bias it is, with no foot-hold in reality. Now, lets go back to trashing Demoncraps!
Sorry, I've spent too much time perusing conservaturd sites today. From a pretty damn good op-ed:
If John McCain wants voters to conclude, as he argues, that he has more independence and experience and better judgment than Barack Obama, he made a bad start by choosing Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska.
Mr. McCain’s supporters are valiantly trying to argue that the selection was a bold stroke that shows their candidate is a risk-taking maverick who will change Washington. (Mr. Obama’s call for change — now “the change we need” — has become all the rage in St. Paul.)
To us, it says the opposite. McCain’s snap choice of Ms. Palin reflects his impulsive streak: a wild play that he made after conservative activists warned him that he would face an all-out revolt in the party if he chose who he really wanted — that smug, faux-pious asshat, Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut.
Mr. McCain’s supporters are valiantly trying to argue that the selection was a bold stroke that shows their candidate is a risk-taking maverick who will change Washington. (Mr. Obama’s call for change — now “the change we need” — has become all the rage in St. Paul.)
To us, it says the opposite. McCain’s snap choice of Ms. Palin reflects his impulsive streak: a wild play that he made after conservative activists warned him that he would face an all-out revolt in the party if he chose who he really wanted — that smug, faux-pious asshat, Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut.
No comments:
Post a Comment